[UEB] Typeforms extending across same text elements
jgoulden at crawfordtech.com
Wed Jan 27 09:14:41 EST 2021
I would tend to agree with Bruce. As long as the end of the first paragraph and the beginning of the second are in the same typeform I think I’d follow this principle.
Here’s hoping Bruce and Caroline aren’t deported just so Justin can keep the cute budgies for himself! 😊
JEN GOULDEN, EDP
Accessibility Compliance Specialist
Past President, Braille Literacy Canada
Treasurer, International Council on English Braille
jgoulden at crawfordtech.com<mailto:jgoulden at crawfordtech.com>
Crawford Technologies Inc.
60 St. Clair Ave. East, Suite 1002
Toronto, ON, Canada, M4T 1N5
This e-mail may be privileged and/or confidential, and the sender does not waive any related rights and obligations. Any distribution, use or copying of this e-mail or the information it contains by other than an intended recipient is unauthorized. If you received this e-mail in error, please advise me (by return e-mail or otherwise) immediately.
Please consider our environment before printing this email.
Ce courrier électronique est confidentiel et protégé. L'expéditeur ne renonce pas aux droits et obligations qui s'y rapportent. Toute diffusion, utilisation ou copie de ce message ou des renseignements qu'il contient par une personne autre que le (les) destinataire(s) désigné(s) est interdite. Si vous recevez ce courrier électronique par erreur, veuillez m'en aviser immédiatement, par retour de courrier électronique ou par un autre moyen.
Devez-vous imprimer ce courriel? Pensons environnement.
From: UEB <ueb-bounces at lists.blc-lbc.ca> On Behalf Of Bruce Toews via UEB
Sent: January 27, 2021 12:38 AM
To: 'Unified English Braille (UEB) Discussion Listserv' <ueb at lists.blc-lbc.ca>
Cc: Bruce Toews <bruce at brucetoews.com>
Subject: Re: [UEB] Typeforms extending across same text elements
I bet you can't say that five times quickly. My gut tells me that it would still apply even in partially-typeformed paragraphs. For example, when someone's thoughts are in italics, you might have something like, Bruce and Caroline's budgies are the cutest birds on the planet, the prime minister thought. And then he would go on and on about how their feeding and caring should be funded by the taxpayer. Then in the next paragraph, you might see, Pity Bruce is such a jerk, he continued to himself. And then he'd go on about where he'd like me deported. In the above elaborate example, you have brief pieces outside of typeforms, but I think the multiple italicized paragraph thing would continue to apply. It's certainly done this way with quotation marks, for the most part. Just my thoughts.
Certified Braille Proofreader
[JAWS Certified, 2020]<http://www.freedomscientific.com/Certification>
For the very best in radio comedy and drama, please visit http://www.mushroomfm.com/escape
From: UEB <ueb-bounces at lists.blc-lbc.ca<mailto:ueb-bounces at lists.blc-lbc.ca>> On Behalf Of Jennifer Jesso via UEB
Sent: Tuesday, January 26, 2021 11:13 PM
To: ueb at lists.blc-lbc.ca<mailto:ueb at lists.blc-lbc.ca>
Cc: Jennifer Jesso <jen.jesso at gmail.com<mailto:jen.jesso at gmail.com>>
Subject: [UEB] Typeforms extending across same text elements
I would like to clarify my understanding of section 9.9.1 in the Rules of UEB. This seems rather basic, but I began to think about it and have now over-thought the issue to the point of thoroughly confusing myself.
My understanding of this section is that it only applies if the consecutive paragraphs are written entirely in a particular typeform. So it would not apply if one paragraph happened to end with a typeform passage and the next paragraph happened to start with another typeform passage of the same type. Nor would it apply even if the first paragraph were entirely in a particular typeform and the next paragraph began with a typeform passage of the same type if the second paragraph continued on after the typeform passage ended. Only if both paragraphs were in the same typeform in their entirety would 9.9.1 apply.
Any confirmation that my understanding is correct, or clarification that I am indeed confused, would be appreciated.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Size: 20262 bytes
More information about the UEB